AI OBSERVABILITY · EVALUATION · INFRASTRUCTURE·2025

Agent Reliability Platform

An open-source observability and reliability platform for tracing AI agent execution, evaluating behavior, and detecting failures such as tool errors, retry loops, latency issues, and reliability regressions.

AGENT OBSERVABILITY & EVAL
TRACE ID: #TR-9942a
span.agent.planner182ms · 412 tokens
↳ span.tool_call: vector_search(query)38ms · status: 200 OK
↳ span.retry_loop_detector0 loops · threshold < 2
EVAL SCORE0.96 / 1.0
LATENCY P95240ms
HALLUCINATIONNONE DETECTED
FRAMEWORK: OPEN-SOURCE RELIABILITY HARNESSBENCHMARK: PASS
TECHNOLOGIES
PythonFastAPILLM EvaluationOpenTelemetryPostgreSQLDockerAsyncio
SYSTEM NATURE

Open-source engineering system and architectural prototype. No fabricated client metrics.

01 / THE PROBLEM

Most LLM agent demonstrations fail in production due to compounding probabilistic errors: unexpected tool failures, circular retry loops, non-deterministic outputs, and silent context degradation that traditional APM tools cannot detect.

02 / APPROACH & WHY I BUILT IT

Developed as an open-source evaluation and observability harness to provide software engineers with visibility into agent decision trees, token usage, tool latency, and behavioral regressions across model revisions.

Built as a modular middleware layer and dashboard. Tracing hooks wrap LLM invocations and tool calls to stream span data via asynchronous queues. An evaluation engine runs programmatic assertions (syntax correctness, schema compliance, latency budgets) alongside model-graded reliability metrics.

03 / HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS

  1. 01.Captures full execution trees including system prompts, agent internal reasoning, tool calls, and inputs/outputs.
  2. 02.Detects cyclic retry patterns and anomalous token spikes in real time.
  3. 03.Executes regression test suites across synthetic and recorded customer workflows.
  4. 04.Computes quantitative reliability scores across tool precision, ground truth alignment, and deterministic execution consistency.

04 / KEY ENGINEERING DECISIONS

  • ✦Zero-overhead async span ingestion to prevent tracing overhead from skewing latency metrics.
  • ✦Programmatic assertions over pure LLM-as-a-judge where possible, guaranteeing deterministic evaluation thresholds.
  • ✦Pluggable evaluation metrics allowing engineering teams to define custom domain-specific invariants.

05 / RELIABILITY & FAILURE BOUNDARIES

The platform itself is built for high resilience: tracing failures fail open so monitored systems are never blocked by observability outages.